From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-30 04:49:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!btnet-peer1!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail From: tony Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ? Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Organization: BT Openworld Message-ID: <3CA5B465.6F017DFD@btinternet.com> References: <3CA48637.C5C4DEF5@despammed.com> <5C0p8.2$qt3.190@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-34-71-103.in-addr.btopenworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: paris.btinternet.com 1017492534 5334 217.34.71.103 (30 Mar 2002 12:48:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Accept-Language: en X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.8-26mdk i586) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21886 Date: 2002-03-30T12:48:54+00:00 List-Id: WJT wrote: > > "Preben Randhol" wrote in message > news:slrnaa97pv.s2.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no... > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:27:45 GMT, WJT wrote: > > > > > make Ada his own, besides that I believe that MS is starting to > understand > > > the benefits of ISO standardization. They have submitted C# and > Besides this is Ada, if you architect you system correctly you should be > isolating you 'dependent things' into layers and subsystems and keeping the > rest of you application true and ...Green. > > > -- > > Preben Randhol �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.� Agreed but isn't it fairly easy (courtesy of David Botton) to produce internet server applications for windows clients, already without touching .NET. still such an effort to produce .NET for ada (or is it the other way round) can only progress both our community and enhance the reliability of using .NET. This is to be at least gently admired...........