From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,86d333341f490421 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-28 08:45:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.162.153.118!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3CA348A9.5000506@oek.dk> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:45:29 +0100 From: "Peter I. Hansen" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020320 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Natural data type ? References: <3CA12AD4.2030807@oek.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: TDC Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.215.62.2 X-Trace: 1017333932 dread01.news.tele.dk 72013 195.215.62.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21770 Date: 2002-03-28T17:45:29+01:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote: >I've often wondered this myself. What Ada calls "Natural" numbers are what >used to be called "Whole" numbers when I was learning The New Math. What Ada >calls "Positive" would have been called "Natural" back then too. I don't >know if this is some version of "The All New And More Improved Math" or if >it was just some mistake that got institutionalized & now we're stuck with >it. > >The secret is not to take the names too seriously - just understand what >they give you and work with it... > >MDC > Yes, I'll just work with it. It dosn't make any difference to me. I just wondered :) /Peter