From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,345a8b767542016e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-17 23:22:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!novia!novia!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed0.news.atl.earthlink.net!news.atl.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: memory leakages with Ada?
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 23:22:39 -0800
Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering
Message-ID: <3C9595BF.E46B23C3@adaworks.com>
References: <3c90af1e@news.starhub.net.sg> <a6r075$7ei$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3c91bfa3.1987537@news.demon.co.uk>
 <Xamk8.66050$cf5.2562714788@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <s3369uo70srjh7m4pjkgt6n4kpt88hdeb8@4ax.com>
 <INIk8.12175$2V5.2924986477@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
 <3pm69u85j4h7efndahkean6trom5utk21m@4ax.com>
 <slrna96qs1.3oe.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <00t69uso35hmunf5mpnfn37ggd9q59tctu@4ax.com>
 <ImNk8.12198$Nd7.2963308722@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
 <3C94EF0F.53049AA@adaworks.com>
 <0c8l8.12462$K43.3172093163@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9e.fc.cc.ef
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server-Date: 18 Mar 2002 07:21:53 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21398
Date: 2002-03-18T07:21:53+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pat Rogers wrote:

> Although I am in Mark Twain's camp when it comes to statistics  ("Lies, damn
> lies, and statistics!"), I'm a bit confused by this last paragraph.  I've known
> Don since long before he was at AJPO; I don't  recall ever attacking him!

Sorry, Pat.   I did not mean that last part for you.    In fact, I have not known
you to be someone who does attack anyone.    What I meant was that some
people do have feelings about Don that have nothing to do with his
contribution, and I was simply indicating that I did not want those people
to throw a lot of irrelevant personal feelings into this discussion.

Richard Riehle