From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92c39a3be0a7f17d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-09 08:24:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!204.71.34.15!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3C8A301F.7BD6D2C@despammed.com> From: Wes Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: named control statements (was: Future with Ada) References: <3wdH7.20135$xS6.32614@www.newsranger.com> <9tqete0gqc@drn.newsguy.com> <3C0924D6.2B5A3087@adaworks.com> <250220022121494455%thehouseofcards@remove.this.part.mac.com> <3C7B0B13.3080003@worldnet.att.net> <3C7D1C89.2000803@home.com> <3C7E7CAD.7070504@mail.com> <3C7FB9D2.D9C6E055@boeing.com> <3C81DF1F.9000503@mail.com> <3C83A112.6080302@mail.com> <3C84223C.A356F466@adaworks.com> <3C853A04.34826F39@despammed.com> <3C8A2249.E7B0D7E5@flash.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 10:54:07 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.144.162 X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1015689267 151.168.144.162 (Sat, 09 Mar 2002 10:54:27 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 10:54:27 EST Organization: Raytheon Company Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20979 Date: 2002-03-09T10:54:07-05:00 List-Id: > > Would it be attractive to be able to do something like: > > > > Outer_Check: if (Some_Boolean) then > > Inner_Check: if (Some_Other_Boolean) then > > Some_Statement ; > > end if Inner_Check ; > > end if Outer_Check ; > > Hmmm, looks exactly like Fortran 95...(except ; is optional) That's OK. Nothing wrong with borrowing a good idea from another language. Others have been borrowing good ideas from Ada for almost twenty years..... -- Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau