From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,77a63690022306d1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-07 06:05:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!gate.dornier.dasa.DE!not-for-mail From: Joachim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schr=F6er?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: JGnat support, was NetBeans and ADA? Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:06:22 +0100 Message-ID: <3C8773DE.7080201@dornier.eads.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: gate.dornier.dasa.de (53.122.46.165) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1015509952 12709036 53.122.46.165 (16 [76083]) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20898 Date: 2002-03-07T15:06:22+01:00 List-Id: Ingo Marks wrote: > Sergey Koshcheyev wrote: > > >>I'd like to also offer my help, since I'm quite interested in Eclipse. I'm >>currently investigating it, but I'm not an experienced programmer and it's >>been a while since I looked at Java. >> >>Sergey. >> > > Did you already take a look at JGNAT? You can compile ADA code into Java > bytecode with it, so you don't need to code in Java anymore. > > http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/languages/ada/compiler/gnat/distrib/jgnat/ > > Ingo. > Hello, I do not want to discourage anyone to use JGnat but there are some drawbacks (see my post some days ago): The current public version does only support j2sdk1.2 (currently we have 1.4.0). From ACT-Europe I got the information that JGnat will not be maintained in future due to lack of customer interest. We were interested in Ada -> Java technology that has future. Our current project demands Java and we have a few hundred thousend loc of (not very nice) Ada83. I would prefer a transition to Ada95 and a parallel improvement of the code but we need an Ada95 to bytecode compiler. Has anyone information about maintenance of other Ada->Java products like Aonix ObjectAda/Averstars appletmagic or similar? J. Schr�er