From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,707a256758168c49
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d9f70618a1f87853,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-04 03:13:48 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.siemens.de!news.mch.sbs.de!not-for-mail
From: Alfred Hilscher <Alfred.Hilscher@icn.siemens.de>
Newsgroups: comp.realtime,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AdaMULTI/Ada 95 for Bare Board
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 12:13:41 +0100
Organization: Siemens AG
Message-ID: <3C8356E5.28D0B600@icn.siemens.de>
References: <3C7CF687.15D36BBE@avionics.saab.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 139.21.122.158
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.realtime:4960 comp.lang.ada:20758
Date: 2002-03-04T12:13:41+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Try to ask this question on news:comp.lang.ada maybe you will get more
response there.

Mikael Lundqvist wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> We are about to start using Green Hills AdaMULTI/Ada 95 for Bare Board
> (PowerPC). Having used ApexAda before with mixed results we are hoping
> for an improvement. Does anybody have experience with AdaMULTI/Ada 95
> for Bare Board to share?
> 
> Regards,
> Mikael