From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd4e40454c63169a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-15 01:57:28 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!62.154.176.138!not-for-mail
From: Steffen Huber <steffen.huber@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ARM vs. LRM vs. ... (was: Re: How to convert characters in a
 string
 into integers ?)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:56:20 +0100
Organization: private
Message-ID: <3C6CDB44.BE40AE49@gmx.de>
References: <a3hng6$jpp$1@paris.btinternet.com>
 <mailman.1012692482.11946.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <a3hudf$emo$1@paris.btinternet.com>
 <mailman.1012726562.29220.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <a3mbt0$oem$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <mailman.1012919821.18138.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <3C5FF78B.D3E73A94@west.raytheon.com> <a3ovuj$s2n$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3C6C1572.C3597B79@avercom.net> <3C6C1A18.6EF57AF7@west.raytheon.com>
Reply-To: steffen.huber@gmx.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.154.176.138
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1013767046 586229 62.154.176.138 (16 [82308])
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: de
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20037
Date: 2002-02-15T10:56:20+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jerry Petrey wrote:
[snipLRM - ARM discussion]
> I know John Barnes referred to it as the LRM in all of his old books but in
> "Programming in Ada95" he switched over to ARM or RM95.
> 
> I still like LRM better - after all, we all know there shouldn't be any other
> language besides Ada :=)

The difficult thing about "ARM" is that there is a processor architecture
called ARM. They have an architecture reference manual, which they call the
ARM ARM...

When I quickly switch between comp.lang.ada and comp.sys.arm, I am often
surprised that the Ada group discusses a processor architecture and that
the ARM group discusses Ada ;-)

Steffen

-- 
steffen.huber@gmx.de               steffen@huber-net.de
GCC for RISC OS  - http://www.arcsite.de/hp/gcc/
Private homepage - http://www.huber-net.de/