From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c459ff0adb576bc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-03 20:26:10 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Refactoring and Ada
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 20:32:22 -0800
Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering
Message-ID: <3C5E0ED6.E2D52BD3@adaworks.com>
References: <3C5AB0B7.9D75D49A@grammatech.com>
 <a3hi78$18ga0c$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>
 <V4Y68.326$xE7.126341269@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9e.fc.c5.97
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server-Date: 4 Feb 2002 04:25:35 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19575
Date: 2002-02-04T04:25:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pat Rogers wrote:

>
> On a much smaller scale of feature, I know
> of projects that have removed a great many "renames clauses" with "use type"
> clauses.

I still prefer renames clauses when only one or two operators  need direct
visibility.    Use type can be as dangerous as the full use clause under
some circumstances.

Richard Riehle