From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,327f3e801a405191,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-12 23:24:47 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!sjc1.nntp.concentric.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!global-news-master
From: Joseph P Vlietstra <joevl@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: "Javadoc" for Ada
Date: 13 Jan 2002 07:24:34 GMT
Organization: Mojave Systems Corporation
Message-ID: <3C413630.A2CEB446@concentric.net>
Reply-To: joevl@concentric.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.36.180.255
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18846
Date: 2002-01-13T07:24:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Our company is currently using a home-grown documentation generation
tool that extracts comments from preambles preceding each Ada function/
procedure.  The tool is written in C++ and generates MIF (FrameMaker
Interchange Format) files.

We recently updated our C/C++ preamble standards to be closer to Java
doc comments and use Doxygen (Javadoc for C++) to generate documentation.
We are considering changing our Ada preamble standards in a similar
manner.  Are there any doc comment utilities for Ada similar?