From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,28422a75b92db2c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-11 16:36:04 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!news-peer-east1.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!nntp1.roc.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!feeder.qis.net!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Al Christians <achrist@easystreet.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Smalltalk and Ada
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:35:53 -0800
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <3C16A669.F6A242A4@easystreet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <f09e375d.0112041156.64715353@posting.google.com>
 <slrna0qcrp.3aj.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <pBbP7.40519$py4.23686276@news2.nash1.tn.home.com>
 <9uou8q$a57td$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>
 <3C10CFFD.A09EA803@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
 <9v18tj$c5rhj$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>
 <slrna19gr9.cti.gisle@apal.ii.uib.no> <9v2r12$nle$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <slrna1a9ga.lec.gisle@apal.ii.uib.no>
 <d29538d5.0112111217.425f9d2b@posting.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17799
Date: 2001-12-11T16:35:53-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Three or two years back, the Smalltalk advocates were proud that the
JWARS system, a big DoD battlefield simulation was being done in
Smalltalk instead of Ada or anything else. Anyone know if this 
project has accomplished what it was intended to accomplish?  If the
DoD has learned anything one way or another from this project?

TIA

Al