From: Ian Wild <ian@cfmu.eurocontrol.int>
Subject: Re: Generics not overloadable
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:41:50 GMT
Date: 2001-11-29T10:41:50+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C0611EB.F7E0E1A9@cfmu.eurocontrol.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ypcN7.89512$XJ4.49083085@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com
Mark Lundquist wrote:
>
...
> 2) Of what use is a name denoting a generic unit within its own formal part?
> You certainly can't instantiate the generic there. What else can you bloody
> well do with a generic unit (in general) besides instantiate it?
It can call itself recursively.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-29 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-28 21:10 Generics not overloadable Mark Lundquist
2001-11-28 21:29 ` Ted Dennison
2001-11-29 3:41 ` Robert Dewar
2001-11-29 5:49 ` R. Tim Coslet
2001-12-09 14:05 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-12-10 16:15 ` Stephen Leake
2001-11-29 10:41 ` Ian Wild [this message]
2001-11-29 19:10 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-11-30 22:38 ` Nick Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-28 17:44 Mark Lundquist
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox