From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fdc75443ea18fb32 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-27 23:48:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.204.128.162!news000.worldonline.se!news010.worldonline.se!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3C0496B9.813D5667@mida.se> From: Mats Karlssohn Organization: MIDA Systemutveckling AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Queue References: <%QRM7.39743$xS6.65958@www.newsranger.com> <9u0qhb$pq5$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:48:09 +0100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.204.132.118 X-Trace: news010.worldonline.se 1006933656 213.204.132.118 (Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:47:36 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:47:36 MET Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17083 Date: 2001-11-28T08:48:09+01:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote: %< > I'd still be willing to settle on the BC's with some enhancements and > extensions. Anybody else willing to go that route? Yes, I'd be willing to support the BC's. They DO exist and they have worked quite fine in the projects where I have used them. Although I have to admit that I have not made any esoteric use of them. I also find them somewhat bulky, but I can't say that I've made any real measurements on neither code size nor execution time, so that may just be my imagination. What enhancements (spl ?) are we talking about ? -- Mats Karlssohn, developer mailto:mats@mida.se Mida Systemutveckling AB http://www.mida.se Box 64, S-732 22 ARBOGA, SWEDEN Phone: +46-(0)589-89808 Fax: +46-(0)589-89809