From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c5b94fed80fc60f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-25 11:34:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3BD85A9F.EEAA5AB@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> From: Wes Groleau Reply-To: wwgrol@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rational 3..2.0b and Solaris 8 does it work ? References: <3bd75651.2974945@news.monmouth.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:31:59 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.144.162 X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1004034724 151.168.144.162 (Thu, 25 Oct 2001 14:32:04 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 14:32:04 EDT Organization: Raytheon Company Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15194 Date: 2001-10-25T13:31:59-05:00 List-Id: garilla wrote: > I have an application I built under Solaris 2.7 (or Solaris 7) with > Rational 3.2.0b and it works fine. When I build the same application > under Solaris 2.8 or (Solaris 8) the application cores out without > even executing the first line of code. I can't use the debugger ..... Are there any hardware differences? Since we will have to go to Solaris 8 eventually, I warned some of our folks about this, and one of them said: I wonder if this guy switched from a single processor machine to a dual processor machine. His brief problem statement sounds just like what happens when we try to run XXXXXX on a dual processor machine, regardless of OS version. -- Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau