From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,208e9ad3aa39640a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-17 13:12:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3BCDDA92.9316731A@earthlink.net> From: "Marc A. Criley" Organization: Quadrus Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: JGNAT and Tasking/Protected Types Problem References: <46afd8d4.0110151230.657986d9@posting.google.com> <3BCC1546.878D06D6@earthlink.net> <46afd8d4.0110170647.3eb8ec87@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:12:34 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.252.122.165 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net 1003349554 158.252.122.165 (Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:12:34 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:12:34 PDT X-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:08:44 PDT (newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14843 Date: 2001-10-17T20:12:34+00:00 List-Id: Aaron Lerch wrote: > > I'm running Win NT and JDK 1.2.2 (I read your other post about > tasking, which saved us from the multi-tasking problem, thanks!). > > We've figured out that the problem is being caused when the protected > object initializes its entries. If we comment out all the entries > (just for fun) then it doesn't have a problem. BUT, we need the > entries (duh). Any thoughts?? 'fraid not. My stuff has tasks, but no protected objects. Of course you could replace the protected objects with tasks, but that of course kinda defeats the purpose of having protected objects. Sorry... Marc