From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,55f7b17fb2df41a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-16 18:34:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Al Christians Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: XML for Win32 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:34:42 -0700 Organization: Public Property Software Message-ID: <3BCCE032.62A78161@easystreet.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3BCB1D6F.1B3468C1@easystreet.com> <3BCB3F12.3CDBC35E@easystreet.com> <3BCB43B9.1D861B23@easystreet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14768 Date: 2001-10-16T18:34:42-07:00 List-Id: David Botton wrote: > > Looks OK to me :-) > Perhaps submit it to AdaPower to replace the old version (that I > > forgot to update for GNATCOM from the old AdaCOM packages). I'll try to tidy it up and send by email to you. > > I often use the MSXML COM object like an in memory database that I can > persist with XML. > Is the performance OK? How many megabytes of XML and/or how many nodes does it take to give any noticeable delays in processing? Al