From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 115aec,ce9ca111bc951193 X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce9ca111bc951193 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-15 09:05:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Volkert Barr Newsgroups: comp.realtime,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Tasking diagram for SW Architecture document Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:58:48 +0200 Organization: TU Berlin, Fachbereich Informatik Message-ID: <3BCB07B8.B4C7FF0C@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.cs.tu-berlin.de 1003161528 21690 130.149.19.1 (15 Oct 2001 15:58:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@cs.tu-berlin.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Oct 2001 15:58:48 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.realtime:4032 comp.lang.ada:14541 Date: 2001-10-15T15:58:48+00:00 List-Id: Mark wrote: > > I'm soliciting opinions (hopefully with some practical experience > behind them) on the notational presentation of a concurrency/tasking > diagram which would be used in a software architecture document for > real-time systems. It should be able to represent both OO and non-OO > (modular, Ada-based, etc) designs. > > I've noticed that a variant of the UML collaboration diagram seems to > be popular in current publications. Although the folks at Artisan feel > that a DARTS type diagram is more expressive. We have already decided > to use UML static structure diagrams (OMG calls them "class diagrams") > showing UML packages for the logical view and deployment diagrams for > the deployment view. > > I am particularly not concerned about CASE tool support for this > diagram since it will NOT be used for any code generation etc. Visio > or similar drawing tools would be fine for this. It is an > informational diagram for engineers. > > thanks > > Mark Sorry for my mail. I read your posting not carefully enough :-( Volkert -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Volkert Barr Institut fuer Softwaretechnik und Theoretische Informatik Fachgruppe Softwaretechnik * TU Berlin email: barr@cs.tu-berlin.de web: www.cs.tu-berlin.de/~barr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * macrosolutions to megaproblems *