From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ee10ec601726fbf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-09 08:30:06 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!denver-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!coop.net!newsfeed1.global.lmco.com!svlnews.lmms.lmco.com!news1.lmtas.lmco.com!not-for-mail
From: Gary Scott <Gary.L.Scott@lmtas.lmco.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: is Ada dying?
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 10:10:44 -0500
Organization: LM Aeronautics
Message-ID: <3BC31374.F9086B7E@lmtas.lmco.com>
References: <Xns9133DBAF0AD71ralphworkcoza@196.25.240.158>
 <9prl5701m0v@drn.newsguy.com> <3bc16b42.3799903@news.demon.co.uk>
 <3BC20BC2.1F92FADB@adaworks.com> <3bc2b25a.1919900@news.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: CAA261517.lmtas.lmco.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; LMTAS}  (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14035
Date: 2001-10-09T10:10:44-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

But Jovial is alive and well for 1750A...and it's served us well for 30
years or so.

John McCabe wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:25:38 -0700, Richard Riehle
> <richard@adaworks.com> wrote:
> 
> >John McCabe wrote:
> >
> >> On 8 Oct 2001 00:38:15 -0700, Robert*@ <Robert_member@newsguy.com>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >John gives a list of Ada 83 compilers below.  Someone might read this as
> >an indication that there are fewer compilers for Ada 95 than Ada 83.  What
> >has happened is quite different.
> 
> Find me an Ada 95 compiler for a Mil-Std-1750A target then?
> 
> I'm sure much of what you have said is true but, as far as I've seen,
> other than porting GNAT technology, there is little support for lesser
> known processors.