From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-06 05:36:08 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3BBEEF36.677865DA@earthlink.net>
From: "Marc A. Criley" <mcqada@earthlink.net>
Organization: Quadrus Corporation
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word
References: <9pif1o01btl@drn.newsguy.com> <9pii95$jus$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3bbd7a77.5463085@news.demon.co.uk> <9pk2dq01gvu@drn.newsguy.com>
 <jCjv7.17235$ev2.27212@www.newsranger.com> <9pkicf02ncr@drn.newsguy.com>
 <VKkv7.17344$ev2.27248@www.newsranger.com>
 <mailman.1002298327.32522.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 12:36:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.178.180.92
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net 1002371768 63.178.180.92 (Sat,
 06 Oct 2001 05:36:08 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 05:36:08 PDT
X-Received-Date: Sat,
 06 Oct 2001 05:32:33 PDT (newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13828
Date: 2001-10-06T12:36:08+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Francisco Javier Loma Daza wrote:
> 
  <snip>
> 
>     Well... they can be in different packages if they DO NOT depend on each other.
> Say
> 
> -- file A.ads
> with B;
> package A is
> 
>     type Object is private;
> 
>     procedure Send(this: Object; to: B.Object);
> end A;
> 
> --file B.ads
> with A;
> package B is
> 
>     type Object is private;
> 
>     procedure Send(this: Object; to: A.Object);
> 
> end B;
> 
> Will be 'with type' really standarized?, I hope so

Mutual dependence will almost certainly be in Ada 200Y in some form. 
The Ada Rapporteurs (sp?) are working out the exact approach and
details.

Marc A. Criley
Senior Staff Engineer
Quadrus Corporation
www.quadruscorp.com