From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec3b1a84cab8fc8a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-06 09:50:10 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!coop.net!newsfeed1.global.lmco.com!svlnews.lmms.lmco.com!not-for-mail From: William Dale Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and the NMD Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 09:34:13 -0700 Organization: LMSSO Message-ID: <3B97A585.69423869@lmco.com> References: <3B970152.4AC6C6E3@PublicPropertySoftware.com> Reply-To: william.dale.jr+adanews@lmco.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.197.210.101 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12813 Date: 2001-09-06T09:34:13-07:00 List-Id: It seems the Trolls are out to drag politics into a language news group. Go away ... to late. Al Christians wrote: > > For all the commiseration about insufficient interest at large in > Ada, there is a development looming that could possibly remedy that > in a single stroke: the National Missile Defense plan. This is a > system so preposterous that one can only think about doing it with > absurdly great software. Is Ada the way to go for such a grandiose > project? Is anyone lobbying to make Ada the "Official Programming > Language of the NMD"? Why or why not? If the software for this > project gets done primarily in non-Ada, then we can suspect that > Ada's time has passed. If it gets done primarily in Ada, then the > anemia of interest in Ada will be cured instanter by a gross > infusion of pelf. > > Al