From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107f24,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid107f24,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-23 10:51:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3B854506.9A45AF38@timesys.com> From: Adam Fineman X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-timesys-2.0beta i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.functional Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of References: <3B6555ED.9B0B0420@sneakemail.com> <87n15lxzzv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <3B672322.B5EA1B66@home.com> <4a885870.0108112341.7ce02ac0@posting.google.com> <3B834E5D.B0D26AB1@adaworks.com> <9lvsic$bet9s$1@ID-9852.news.dfncis.de> <0sDnZRVkz5qL@eisner.encompasserve.org> <3b83847d.1117251944@news.worldonline.nl> <3B83F498.E0F6C582@timesys.com> <7aTg7.10919$2u.78544@www.newsranger.com> <3B842DEA.E01CA1BE@timesys.com> <5M7h7.11864$2u.82854@www.newsranger.com> <3B85294F.BB780B7F@timesys.com> <3B852B06.3F8E3D9A@lmtas.lmco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:01:42 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.117.135.98 X-Trace: news.uswest.net 998589085 65.117.135.98 (Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:51:25 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:51:25 CDT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12351 comp.lang.c:76479 comp.lang.c++:85217 comp.lang.functional:7661 Date: 2001-08-23T14:01:42-04:00 List-Id: Gary Scott wrote: > > Hi, > Concurrent/Harris on the other hand has an excellent "real-time unix". > As does my company. :-) As do several others. > However, we've actually been successfully using Solaris in a real-time > environment for avionics models. > I'm not sure I understand. In what capacity have you been using Solaris in a real-time environment? -- Adam Fineman Software Engineer QA Department TimeSys Corporation -- Opinions posted here are my own. They do not necessarily reflect those of the management or the other employees at TimeSys Corporation.