From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-20 00:05:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!xfer02.netnews.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail From: pete Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of service attack. Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 03:02:10 -0400 Organization: PF Message-ID: <3B80B5F2.B76@mindspring.com> References: <3b690498.1111845720@news.worldonline.nl> <9kbu15$9bj@augusta.math.psu.edu> <9kbvsr$a02@augusta.math.psu.edu> <3B69DB35.4412459E@home.com> <9kp9n7$ivm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B73337F.862F8D93@home.com> <9lb7hu$72h$1@norfair.nerim.net> <3B7C6977.3648F061@home.com> <3B7CE3E1.6F80@mindspring.com> Reply-To: pfiland@mindspring.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 3f.35.7c.94 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Date: 20 Aug 2001 07:05:45 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (Win95; I) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12110 comp.lang.c:75528 comp.lang.c++:84068 Date: 2001-08-20T07:05:45+00:00 List-Id: Kaz Kylheku wrote: > > In article <3B7CE3E1.6F80@mindspring.com>, pete wrote: > >Kaz Kylheku wrote: > >> You simply have a narrow, weak idea of what constitutes a language. > > > >"The standard library is not part of the C language proper, > > ``C language proper'' != ``C language''. > > Nice try! I'll give it one more go: "C language proper" in K&R == "language" in the standard -- pete