From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1014db,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-14 08:42:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!cyclone.swbell.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3B794622.8A15DD54@gsde.hou.us.ray.com> From: "Stanley R. Allen" Reply-To: Stanley_R_Allen-NR@Raytheon.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-2.14.10smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of References: <3b690498.1111845720@news.worldonline.nl> <9kbu15$9bj@augusta.math.psu.edu> <3b6a453c.1193942215@news.worldonline.nl> <9keejl$fhj@augusta.math.psu.edu> <3c30da40.0108060848.796d9bd9@posting.google.com> <3B6F3216.F410BBFF@home.com> <3B6F3FAE.B9B9FFCF@globetrotter.qc.ca> <3B6F5BF6.1E22543B@home.com> <3B706538.5AB33833@globetrotter.qc.ca> <3B70BDA5.575D8E6A@home.com> <3B71C74E.505A8753@globetrotter.qc.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:39:14 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.27.47.71 X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com X-Trace: dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com 997803555 192.27.47.71 (Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:39:15 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:39:15 CDT Organization: Raytheon Company Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11921 comp.lang.c:74176 comp.lang.c++:82490 Date: 2001-08-14T10:39:14-05:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison wrote: > *every* Ada compiler (as > opposed to "most" C++ compilers) has support for inline assembler. Its actually > in the standard. Ada does have a standard for inline assembler language (package System.Machine_Code). But it is one of those features which, according to the standard, is not required to be implemented for a 'conforming' implementation of Ada. See http://www.adahome.com/rm95/rm9x-01-01-03.html (paragraph 10) http://www.adahome.com/rm95/rm9x-13-08.html (paragraph 8) -- Stanley Allen mailto:Stanley_R_Allen-NR@Raytheon.com