From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-17 14:46:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!news.algonet.se!algonet!pepsi.tninet.se!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Skoglund <stetson@ebox.tninet.se>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of  
 service attack.
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:59:39 +0200
Organization: Telenordia
Message-ID: <3B784DCB.A3BF419D@ebox.tninet.se>
References: <bebbba07.0107292308.d1192fc@posting.google.com>
   <3b690498.1111845720@news.worldonline.nl> <9kbu15$9bj@augusta.math.psu.edu>
 <made-on-a-macintosh-969204-20460@usenet.l1t.lt>
 <9kbvsr$a02@augusta.math.psu.edu> <3B69DB35.4412459E@home.com>
 <q22nk9.r1p.ln@10.0.0.2> <JzUb7.1653$NJ6.5860@www.newsranger.com>
 <9kp9n7$ivm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <apesk9.env.ln@10.0.0.2>
 <sYwc7.3920$NJ6.15560@www.newsranger.com>
 <1exve0j.1lboe8gneysd0N%clarkcox3@yahoo.com>
 <wdzc7.4066$NJ6.17172@www.newsranger.com> <rvnuk9.2ua.ln@10.0.0.2>
NNTP-Posting-Host: du44-147.ppp.algonet.se
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: zingo.tninet.se 998084556 13285 195.100.147.44 (17 Aug 2001 21:42:36
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@algo.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Aug 2001 21:42:36 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: sv,en,en-US
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12078 comp.lang.c++:83551
Date: 2001-08-17T21:42:36+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bart.Vanhauwaert@nowhere.be wrote:
> Given modern CPU's it is actually a loss to agressively unroll
> or inline. ichache pressure and such does that to you. In a lot
> of cases a missed cache hit is much more costly than a simple,
> easy to branch predict call.

Nothing is modern about a MilStd 1750 CPU !!

Remember that a number of people on comp.lang.ada is 
embedded system programmers which must adopt to some
very restricted platforms.

Does it exist any intel offerings now which is RadHard ?