From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-02 06:18:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3B6946CA.7BEEFCFC@earthlink.net> From: "Marc A. Criley" Organization: Quadrus Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Java portability References: <%cR67.1385$mz6.4505748@nnrp3.proxad.net> <9jgopl$5v6$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <9jh2cs$aon$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <2sU67.1485$di7.4670499@nnrp3.proxad.net> <9jhb8u$g3s$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <3B5C4A92.647FC2EC@earthlink.net> <2bb77.5186$DL4.5097616@nnrp5.proxad.net> <3B5D5B79.F2DC527E@earthlink.net> <9jp5dc$e2b$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <5ee5b646.0108011843.12cc0e9a@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:18:42 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.252.122.227 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net 996758322 158.252.122.227 (Thu, 02 Aug 2001 06:18:42 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 06:18:42 PDT X-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 06:15:47 PDT (newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11076 Date: 2001-08-02T13:18:42+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > > > I'm nearly certain that each vendor has their own means of > > interfacing to the Java libraries. I've not looked at the specifics > > of how AdaMagic does it, but I know that JGNAT added Java-specific > > pragmas to support interfacing. > > Well it is amazing to see how often the blind lead the blind on CLA > :-) > > In fact there are *no* "Java-specific" pragmas in GNAT, and the entire > discussion of these imaginary beasts is a tribute to people's > willingness to believe anything they read :-) I do not recall stating there were "Java-specific" pragmas in GNAT, I believe the text reads "JGNAT added Java-specific pragmas to support interfacing." To wit, from the JGNAT 1.1p User Guide: pragma Java_Constructor (function-name); Please accurately read my postings to avoid attributing statements to me that I did not make. > > Note that anyone can look this up in the GNAT RM, just search for the > word Java, you will not find it. But you will find it throughout the JGNAT User Guide. Marc A. Criley Senior Staff Engineer Quadrus Corporation www.quadruscorp.com