From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cfc2709ce8ab6d95 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-22 22:42:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news.esoc.esa.de!not-for-mail From: Colin Paul Gloster Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:39:25 +0200 Organization: well, [cough] I am a member of the Association of C and C++ Users (WWW.ACCU.org) but do not speak for them Message-ID: <3B5BB88D.DC8AEDE6@ACM.org> References: <3B59B19E.C09F054A@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org NNTP-Posting-Host: cgloster.esoc.esa.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10442 Date: 2001-07-23T07:39:25+02:00 List-Id: Lao Xiao Hai wrote: "There is a very interesting discussion on comp.lang.c++.moderated regarding Ada versus C++ for safety-critical software. Some readers of this forum might find it stimulating. Richard Riehle AdaWorks Software Engineering richard@adaworks.com" Thank you very much. I am a member of the Association of C & C++ Users ( HTTP://WWW.ACCU.org/ ) and subscribe to some of its high quality email lists but do not these days look at the newsgroups for C and C++ nearly as much as accu-general (the main ACCU list). For those of you trying to find the thread Lao Xiao Hai alerted us to, the initial post is news:bebbba07.0107191159.47311f81@posting.google.com timestamped 19 Jul 2001 18:40:10 -0400 and started by 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) on news:comp.lang.c++.moderated Regards, Colin Paul Gloster