From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cfc2709ce8ab6d95,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-21 09:44:33 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: Lao Xiao Hai <laoxhai@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Ada vs C++
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:45:18 -0700
Organization: AdaWorks Software Engineering
Message-ID: <3B59B19E.C09F054A@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: richard@adaworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9e.fc.cc.a1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server-Date: 21 Jul 2001 16:43:50 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10402
Date: 2001-07-21T16:43:50+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

There is a very interesting discussion on
comp.lang.c++.moderated regarding Ada
versus C++ for safety-critical software.
Some readers of this forum might find it
stimulating.

Richard Riehle
AdaWorks Software Engineering
richard@adaworks.com
http://www.adaworks.com