From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,971aa11c293c3db1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-21 09:27:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news1.ebone.net!news.ebone.net!news.net.uni-c.dk!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language? Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 18:27:49 +0200 Organization: Centre for Chaos and Turbulence Studies, Niels Bohr Institute Message-ID: <3B59AD85.318F5BD6@nbi.dk> References: <3B5F3C2B@MailAndNews.com> <3B586AF9.FE610CFD@home.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: alf.nbi.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.net.uni-c.dk 995732870 39490 130.225.212.55 (21 Jul 2001 16:27:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.net.uni-c.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 16:27:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; OSF1 V4.0 alpha) X-Accept-Language: fo,da,no,sv,is,de,fr,en Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10401 Date: 2001-07-21T18:27:49+02:00 List-Id: Warren: > OS/2 died a grizzly death because it was too costly to port/extend it to > newer platforms (I understand it was largely assembler code). You never > saw OS/2 on the Alpha, but you did see windows there. Hmmm... I wonder > what the difference was? ;-) According to my knowledge, Windows is largely written in assembler, so I suppose that the reason was something else. Maybe that the Alpha architecture competed with the Power-2 architecture on which IBM runs AIX? Jacob -- Growing older is compulsory. Growing up isn't.