From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,971aa11c293c3db1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-18 11:28:59 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.frii.net!pulsar.dimensional.com!dimensional.com!coop.net!newsfeed1.global.lmco.com!svlnews.lmms.lmco.com!not-for-mail
From: Paul Storm <paul.a.storm@lmco.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language?
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:38:31 -0700
Organization: rse
Message-ID: <3B54B057.B45D68EE@lmco.com>
References: <5be89e2f.0107170838.c71ad61@posting.google.com>
 <3B549C4D.FFB45132@acm.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.197.40.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10188
Date: 2001-07-17T14:38:31-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> 
> codesavvy wrote:
> >
> > How come it is not more widely accepted?  The stuff I read here states
> > that it is because the rest of the world is stupid.  From what I can
> > tell there is plenty of crappy code written in Ada.  I think many who
> > share the view that Ada is the best programming language offering
> > significant advantages over other programming language might want to
> > re-think their positions.
> 
> This is an obvious troll from someone who is too stupid to have anything
> better to do. No intelligent person will respond to it.
> 
Since you responded, what does that make you?  :-)

Note that I am responding to your posting, not his.  ;-P