From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,216b18d81cce4f75
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-07 16:21:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!194.213.69.151!news.algonet.se!algonet!pepsi.tninet.se!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Skoglund <stetson@ebox.tninet.se>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Microkernel?
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 01:22:21 +0200
Organization: Telenordia
Message-ID: <3B4799AD.98849145@ebox.tninet.se>
References: 
 <3B183CB8.3EE396E7@engineer.com><_M3S6.8957$HL5.1284411@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com><t1cS6.16384$DG1.3250771@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com><8DKS6.27593$%_1.4657414@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com><AGyU6.55016$DG1.9005577@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com><YSzU6.96$6d5.30076@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com><slrn9i6bu0.28n.gerhard.nospam@lilith.hqd-internal><lINU6.1857$6d5.626271@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com><0daV6.9332$6d5.1953313@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <wcck82i1u1v.fsf@world.std.com>
 <ZHlV6.18838$m4.94651@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <3B34AE89.FFBE39EF@ebox.tninet.se> <9heq45$j9f$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <3B3B6F8F.EAA0F196@online.no> <Ie0%6.1640$Kf3.16861@www.newsranger.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: du183-240.ppp.algonet.se
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: zingo.tninet.se 994548009 23591 195.100.240.183 (7 Jul 2001 23:20:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@algo.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jul 2001 23:20:09 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: sv,en,en-US
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9620
Date: 2001-07-07T23:20:09+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison wrote:
> >microkernel either. All the interesting developments in microkernels
> >happened after mach was released :-)
> 
> I did notice that the HURD folks blamed most of their delays (and thus the rise
> of Linux) on MACH.

It was a question of intellectual property rights.
The GNU project had in fact started its own kernel-development
effort and had made maybe 10% of the effort when
CMU released Mach with a GPL compatible license.