From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,216b18d81cce4f75 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-28 10:49:46 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!148.122.208.68!news2.oke.nextra.no!nextra.com!news3.oke.nextra.no.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3B3B6D4C.5DEC7D52@online.no> From: "Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen" Organization: Jensen programvareutvikling X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Microkernel? References: <%3H_6.416$Kf3.3173@www.newsranger.com> <9hfgrm$ngd$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.67.235.194 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@nextra.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:49:35 MEST X-Trace: news3.oke.nextra.no 993750575 130.67.235.194 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:45:48 +0100 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9211 Date: 2001-06-28T18:45:48+01:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote: > > Its a shame - I'd love to see an Ada OS available for PCs, etc. However, I > think that the project was just too ambitious to succeed. If it had the > first objective being a simple, embedable OS to handle scheduling and I/O, > it might have got to that level - then been able to progress from there. A > good, solid, real-time executive would be a good place to start for a more > robust PC-ish OS. Have you had a look at tunis? It is an existing operating system written in Ada. I don't remember what hardware it runs on, but it would probably be easier to port an existing OS than writing it from scratch. Greetings,