From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f868fe8fe0ec86c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-07 15:47:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.uni2.dk!dax.net!juliett.dax.net!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3B20045D.D9ADAA3@spam-block.gmx.li> From: Aron Felix Gurski Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F6derna=20Lejonhj=E4rta?= X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: smalltalk vs. Ada References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 22:46:43 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.216.50.74 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tele2.no X-Trace: juliett.dax.net 991954003 193.216.50.74 (Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:46:43 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:46:43 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8369 Date: 2001-06-07T22:46:43+00:00 List-Id: Rod Weston wrote: > Still investigating OOP languages. I'm quite impressed with Ada, from > what I've seen and read so far, but now want to turn my attention to > smalltalk. Any ideas on how Ada and smalltalk compare? Are there any > other OOP languages worth looking at? You might consider looking at Modula-2. The ISO standard 10514 (parts 1, 2 and 3) added generics and object-oriented features to the original object-based language. -- -- Aron NB: To reply by e-mail, remove "spam-block." from my address. - - - - - - - - - - - "If you don't learn to laugh at your problems, then you will have nothing about which to laugh when you are old." -- E.W. Howe