From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4871bb700d475964
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-07 13:01:35 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Al Christians <alc@PublicPropertySoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: an interested business-oriented programmer
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 13:04:25 -0700
Organization: Trillium Resources Corporation
Message-ID: <3B1FDE49.17AAF924@PublicPropertySoftware.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MEMT6.2373$bA3.115349@www.newsranger.com>
 <KQQT6.71423$%i7.53971128@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8347
Date: 2001-06-07T13:04:25-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

tmoran@acm.org wrote:
> 
> >Gnat manages to do it with just "stdcall" as an interface convention, which is
>   Is there a Windows targetted compiler that doesn't support "stdcall"?
> 

The Gnat user guide says:

"If the C calling convention is missing from package API, then the
definition file contains the mangled Ada names of the above entities" 

That seems to say that interfacing with unmangled names is not 
supported by gnat with StdCall.  Is that right?


Al