From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,72df971449cd9b02 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-16 13:02:55 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!coop.net!newsfeed1.global.lmco.com!svlnews.lmms.lmco.com!not-for-mail From: William Dale Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada95 and .NET Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:24:42 -0700 Organization: LMSSO Message-ID: <3ADB1CCA.9FE756B9@lmco.com> References: <3AD1D5FC.2880536D@t-online.de> <9bevqg$4ib$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Reply-To: william.dale.jr+adanews@lmco.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.197.10.38 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6925 Date: 2001-04-16T09:24:42-07:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote: > > Well, that's a little like tossing a stink-bomb into the room. :-) > > Its unfortunate that there is a perception out there that Ada is inevitably > going to miss the boat on a newly emerging environment, simply because it is > Ada and hence, can't win. (Sort of the Al Bundy of programming languages? > :-) I think its more of the Homer Simpson of programming languages - it does work at Nuclear Power plants? ;-) Bill Dale