From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6216cea7ed8d90a9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-02 19:29:00 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Al Christians Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT Ada 3.13 + DOS revisted Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 19:28:39 -0800 Organization: Trillium Resources Corporation Message-ID: <3AA064E7.AAFBA51F@easystreet.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <983538732.184184@ernani.logica.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5390 Date: 2001-03-02T19:28:39-08:00 List-Id: Whatever was the current version of GNAT around five years ago would do plain DOS. I ran it on a machine without Windows. That was something in the range of 3.04 to 3.07, I think. Al Ted Dennison wrote: > > In article , Randy Brukardt says... > > > >As far as compiling the Code on bare MS-DOS -- I'll be happy to sell you > >a copy of Janus/Ada 83 for MS-DOS (16-bit) or Janus/Ada 95 for MS-DOS > >(32-bit with extender). I know of no other MS-DOS solution that is still > >supported, and I don't think you can even get any other MS-DOS 16-bit > >compiler. > > I think that Aonix's compiler used to have the ability to target compilations to > DOS, although the compilations themselves had to be performed in Windows. I > don't know if you can still do that though. > > --- > T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html > home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com