From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b16c9883f36bc904 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Lionel Draghi Subject: Re: WinNT ADA compilers comparison Date: 2000/07/20 Message-ID: <3A92E737.E690906A@free.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 648802952 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3976C68A.12386D00@cadwin.com> <8l7fff$9kb$1@front1.grolier.fr> X-Accept-Language: fr-FR, en, it Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp3.proxad.net 964126045 212.27.40.135 (Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:47:25 CEST) Organization: Guest of ProXad - France MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:47:25 CEST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-07-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Thierry Lelegard wrote: > ... > I would think that the most important "time" point is > the performance of the generated code. You compile > once but you run your application many times... A lot of software that where more compiled than used :-) ________________________________________________________________________ Lionel Draghi http://www.Ada-France.org/