From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6784fd29e43ab726 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-22 20:16:40 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!feeder.via.net!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc2.on.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3A6D04B1.CFF7215C@home.com> From: "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 95 grammar for aflex? References: <3A6703BD.5D78D62@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <949qf7$l43$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A68877B.C7AF95D2@uol.com.br> <94c7eq$i89$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A69BA8F.A26A531E@uol.com.br> <94comf$vf7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A6A69A1.6A38AAC7@mindspring.com> <94f16m$k8t$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A6B1CCF.AC1363E1@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:16:37 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.141.193.52 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc2.on.home.com 980223397 24.141.193.52 (Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:16:37 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:16:37 PST Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4350 Date: 2001-01-23T04:16:37+00:00 List-Id: Larry Kilgallen wrote: > > In article <3A6B1CCF.AC1363E1@mindspring.com>, Larry Hazel writes: > > Robert Dewar wrote: > >> > >> In article <3A6A69A1.6A38AAC7@mindspring.com>, > >> Larry Hazel wrote: > >> > >> > So Robert, are you going to write a new parser for g++ in Ada > >> > and show them up? > >> > >> The new parser for g++ is being written by the code sourcery > >> folks, and I assume the language is traditional C :-) > > > > But wouldn't it be neat to have a C++ compiler written in Ada that outperforms > > other C++ compilers? > > Only if it also had fewer defects. > > But then it would be _great_ !!! Why encourage more C++? Let it suffer from it's own problems ;-) -- Warren W. Gay VE3WWG http://members.home.net/ve3wwg