From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6bc8ce99e45144be X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Task stack overflow problem with GNAT Date: 2000/10/09 Message-ID: <3A094BF4.C737809F@telepath.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 679285644 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8rkhnt$4ac$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39DE061B.51F62B69@icdc.com> <8rrtmc$fcc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en,pdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role , We Care X-Trace: monger.newsread.com 971085677 38.195.186.125 (Mon, 09 Oct 2000 06:01:17 EDT) Organization: Telepath Systems (telepath.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 06:01:17 EDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-10-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: fabien_bousquet@my-deja.com wrote: > My code is supposed to be embedded and I do not use dynamic allocation. Do you mean you don't have a heap and access to the "new" operator at all, or do you mean you do, but you aren't supposed to use them? There should be no problem in performing dynamic allocation in an embedded system, as long as you do it once at startup rather than repetedly at runtime. -- T.E.D. Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com Work - mailto:dennison@ssd.fsi.com WWW - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html ICQ - 10545591