From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5d125ec1d17ebeaf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-08 01:37:01 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!hookup!yeshua.marcam.com!news.mathworks.com!mvb.saic.com!dayuc.dayton.saic.com!hopper.dayton.saic.com!hopperj From: James Hopper Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Corruption in Ada9x office - suppression of Ada survey results Date: 8 Nov 1994 07:18:00 GMT Organization: SAIC Distribution: world Message-ID: <39n8n8$jqj@dayuc.dayton.saic.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: hopper.dayton.saic.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: Nuntius Version 1.3b14 X-XXMessage-ID: X-XXDate: Tue, 8 Nov 1994 06:22:13 GMT Date: 1994-11-08T07:18:00+00:00 List-Id: .... Lots of virulent crap deleted... In article Gregory Aharonian, srctran@world.std.com writes: >And as long as bullshit like this is going on, don't expect anyone in the >private sector to invest into Ada commercialization. It is hard enough to >for Ada startups to fight detractors pushing other languages, but to have to >fight supposed Ada supporters is utterly idiotic. > > >Greg Aharonian Greg, ok so you are going to give up, please do! I'm tired and cranky right now, its late, but still i have had enough of your posts!! I know that if i called such a hotline i might have a concern about someone selling [or giving away] my name and number to a vendor, i personally don't mind such mail but i know a lot of people who do, and the answer may have been as simple as that. your constant harping on these subjects is more than annoying! why don't you ask Chris Anderson why the data is not being released before firing off with your editorial comment! Its a valid question, but you presented nothing in your note that indicates you or your correspondent did this. If one of you did how about posting the result of that. But i would not personally take it bad if the 9x people refuse to speak to you on anything but a formal basis. perhaps someone who knows someone could ask the question without Gregs usaul hostile spin on it!