From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.224.169.1 with SMTP id w1mr16290551qay.4.1374771618054;
        Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.4.38 with SMTP id h6mr281561igh.8.1374771618006; Thu, 25
 Jul 2013 10:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder02.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!cb17no236140qab.0!news-out.google.com!dk8ni1421qab.0!nntp.google.com!cb17no236137qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <14e47bb4-a838-47f8-8617-eb404679d3af@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=66.126.103.122;
 posting-account=RxNzCgoAAACA5KmgtFQuaU-WaH7rjnAO
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
References: <14e47bb4-a838-47f8-8617-eb404679d3af@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <39c8fb6b-314c-4eae-80a5-74bfaf6de16b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: my instansiation of a generic Remote_Call_Interface need a type
 declared in a package of wrong categorization
From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@aol.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:00:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16514
Date: 2013-07-25T10:00:17-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 25, 2013 9:26:13 AM UTC-7, donts...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi!
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I have created the following test packages for my question: My_RCI and Te=
st_RCI(generic).
>=20
> I am trying to create a distributed application. I would like to make sev=
eral of these packages generic.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> In some cases I run into the issue, that I wish to instantiate a Remote_C=
all_Interface package.
>=20
> Below I have My_RCI. This package tries to instantiate the necessary pack=
ages. However, the __body__ of Test_RCI need a type that is declared in Cor=
e_Package. Core_Package is not of correct categorization (and I can't make =
it become so).
>=20
> The specification part of Test_RCI and My_RCI are not depending on Core_P=
ackage.
>=20
> As soon as I "with" the Core_Package I get error message of course.
>=20
> Does it exists some method to "trinkle" Core_Package through to the body =
of Test_RCI? I have tried quite a few things to solve this, and I have at t=
he moment given up:)

Can you move your generic instantiation to the body of My_RCI?  It looks li=
ke the only thing from the generic's specification that you need in the spe=
cification of My_RCI is the procedure Test_RCI.  You could declare that wit=
hout a generic instantiation in My_RCI's spec, and in the body, make it a r=
ename of This.Test_RCI.

If the specification of Test_RCI is more complex, so that there's a number =
of things that you want in the generic Test_RCI to be visible in My_RCI, th=
en it might be possible to split the generic Test_RCI into two generic pack=
ages so that you instantiate one in My_RCI's spec, and the problematic one =
in My_RCI's body. =20

Note: I haven't tested any of this.

                           -- Adam