From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9b0810d3106d9b8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elias_Salom=E3o_Helou_Neto?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fun with C Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <39c17317-0a45-4273-85c6-f54335a6326d@q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <27cf3992-4132-4483-9110-adc7a089cd4a@e8g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <3ccf18a2-ba10-42bc-aeab-9368749961fb@a11g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <4c2b6a58-e3b6-47da-95e0-64853be5c1f9@v11g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <86748003-860f-4729-ae26-55be1e58ac2b@d27g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4b5748dc-60fa-4cec-a317-054626e9a1ca@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 186.223.216.44 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1303453861 25181 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2011 06:31:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 06:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=186.223.216.44; posting-account=8auP9QoAAACkSx2qxJhP83KA6-tg78E8 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8 SUSE/7.0.528.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.528.0 Safari/534.8,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19947 Date: 2011-04-21T23:29:34-07:00 List-Id: On Apr 21, 8:29=A0pm, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > I suspected that, and that is your bias here. For the most part, I don't > agree with the need for formal training. It's useful for those with no > programming training at all, but for those that have significant programm= ing > experience, picking up a new language does not require that level of > imersion. C does. People must understand it. That's what I've been trying to explain. > Dunno anything about C++, but at least two of the best Ada books are > available free on-line (English's "Ada 95: The Craft of Object-Oriented > Programming" [for new programmers] and Riehle's "Ada Distilled" [for > experienced programmers new to Ada]). I've probably forgotten some. The A= da > Programming Wikibook is also a good resource, especially to answer > questions. Great, thank you for pointing me those! But they're still books :-) Elias.