From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18385551e0d37b37
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-04 03:59:37 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!caen!crl.dec.com!crl.dec.com!jac.zko.dec.com!ada9x.enet.dec.com!brett
From: brett@ada9x.enet.dec.com (Bevin R. Brett)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
Date: 3 NOV 94 08:01:51 EST
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <39an0u$fbq@jac.zko.dec.com>
References: <44279.cwarwick@fox.nstn.ns.ca> <38qq4u$as2@theopolis.orl.mmc.com>
 <EACHUS.94Nov2152033@spectre.mitre.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ADA9X
Date: 1994-11-03T08:01:51-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <38qq4u$as2@theopolis.orl.mmc.com> dennison@romulus23.DAB.GE.COM (Ted Dennison) writes:

> Don't be so hard on Alsys (at least not for this). I know of NO Ada system
> on any platform that handles tasks and I/O that well. VAX Ada comes close, 
> but simultanious Text_IOs will kill the application. Tasks and I/O are 
> NEVER a no-brainer.

We (DIGITAL) are unaware of ANY problems with doing simultanious Text_IOs with
VAX Ada, and believe it works.  Have you reported them to us?

/Bevin
DEC Ada team