From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5850c59062ca527a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-03 03:30:17 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!news.mathworks.com!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Type System.ADDRESS
Date: 3 Nov 1994 06:30:17 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <39ahk9$89c@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <393k18$huv@theopolis.orl.mmc.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: schonberg.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1994-11-03T06:30:17-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bob, what do you mean by implementing Address as static? this is a use
of the term static that does not seem to correspond to its technical
meaning in Ada, and I just don't understand what you mean. Can you give
a specific example of the problems you are having.

It is certainly legitimate to implement Address as a static subtype, but
I don't thing this is what you are talking about!