From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6d1607a5397de6b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-10-31 09:09:49 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "E. Robert Tisdale" <edwin@netwood.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is the Ada World Embarrassed by the Defense Industry?
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:06:01 +0000
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <39FEFBF8.D62508B8@netwood.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <VZgL5.34$pq3.5686@news.flash.net> <39FDE9E4.35F615A6@netwood.net>
 <39FE461D.275F1363@ix.netcom.com> <8tmt7o$vbj$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1664
Date: 2000-10-31T17:06:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

mjsilva@my-deja.com wrote:

> I'm still interested in hearing
> if any of those who have switched from Ada
> to The Radiant Future of language X
> are finding that there's trouble in paradise X.
> It seems that if there is trouble in paradise X
> then we Ada advocates should be sure and document it
> for the benefit of others who are considering such a switch,
> or who are simply evaluating languages.
> OTOH, if everybody is happy as a clam using X
> then I guess we need to rethink some of our assumptions.

Mike,

We are talking about programming languages -- NOT religions.
Aren't we?