From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7d2851c9924bb432,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-10-28 17:41:11 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!207.172.3.37!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail
From: Daniel Allex <dallex@erols.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: User defined boolean
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 20:41:31 -0400
Message-ID: <39FB723B.25D05446@erols.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: hH6Mp+XZzRkfZ/cEzvAMto9eIMkjFSGPshGg7hJ4Q3U=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Oct 2000 00:40:25 GMT
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1612
Date: 2000-10-29T00:40:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I created a type PASS_FLAG that is an enumeration type of FAIL and
PASS.  I have seven funtions that each return PASS_FLAG, and I wanted to
AND them together an print out the result.  My flag wont work with
either AND or "+".  Can this be done or should I just use the predefined
boolean.  I had reasons for defining my own enumeration type.