From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b14a804025dceb20 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Constructors/Destructors in Ada95 Date: 2000/10/19 Message-ID: <39EEED51.CB5D35E6@telepath.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 683374655 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <39EE160D.F0A2000@bigfoot.com> X-Accept-Language: en,pdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role , We Care X-Trace: newshog.newsread.com 971959494 38.195.186.125 (Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:44:54 EDT) Organization: Telepath Systems (telepath.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:44:54 EDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-10-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Francois Godme wrote: > Where can I find articles, papers, or posted messages explaining me the > reasons for the lack of support for Constructors/Destructors directly in > the language. I have heard that, in 1995, Tucker Taft on c.l.a posted > several messages on this very subject. The Ada95 Rationale would be a good place to look for all the "Why?" questions you might have. Its online at http://www.adaic.org/standards/95rat/RAThtml/rat95-contents.html -- T.E.D. Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com Work - mailto:dennison@ssd.fsi.com WWW - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html ICQ - 10545591