From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,d87a073fea49d80c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Nicolas Brunot Subject: Re: Objectada link time Date: 2000/10/04 Message-ID: <39DADE4D.4B750B52@cadwin.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 677357993 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <39D46B13.BEFF4288@cadwin.com> <39DA0452.71EB729B@swbell.net> X-Accept-Language: fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp2.proxad.net 970644816 212.27.40.167 (Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:33:36 CEST) Organization: Guest of ProXad - France MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:33:36 CEST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-10-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John Magness a �crit : > >> Apex link is about 1 mn > >> Objectada link reaches 10 mn ... > >> > >> So there should be not only a microsoft linker problem here. > >> > >> Has anybody found a solution to this kind of problem ? > >> Thanks for any information > > >Just a guess, but are the compiler options selected logically equivalent? > >--- I believe I've read that ObjectAda does no optimization.... > >inclusion/exclusion of debug data? > Hard to know if they have the same effect, and actually total size of object files is bigger with objectada than with apex. But I don't think objects file total size or compilers options is the problem. No matter which options you use, Apex link is always by far much faster than Objectada It wouldn't explain such a difference (link about 10 times faster than Objectada) in /VERBOSE mode, almost all the time difference occurs between the 1rst and 2nd line of linker output "Start Pass1" and "Searching Libraries" and the linker output is about 13000 lines !!