From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f78d2f93ab55fd75 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Lionel Draghi Subject: Re: Ada development environments Date: 2000/09/18 Message-ID: <39C689DB.CF5BC1AF@free.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 671366763 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <39BD1FB6.1684694D@trw.com> <39BD3696.797AFE23@west.raytheon.com> <8plrqi$2iv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39beb659.17723416@news.demon.co.uk> X-Accept-Language: fr, en, it Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp4.proxad.net 969312903 212.27.53.216 (Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:35:03 CEST) Organization: Guest of ProXad - France MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:35:03 CEST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-09-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John McCabe wrote: > In case anyone isn't aware, it would appear that Rational's Rose > product (at least version 98i) for Unix (Solaris) actually uses a > Windows subsystem emulator to produce a GUI that is pretty much > identical to the NT version, so it would seem reasonable to assume > that, for Rose at least, they will be using the NT version as a > baseline. (Correct me if I'm wrong obviously :-) > > I wouldn't be at all surprised if that is the way they will be going > with Apex. This emulator makes Rose really slow on Unix platform (it can't compare with NT). I hope for Apex users that Rational has done a different design choice than for Rose :-) ________________________________________________________________________ Lionel Draghi http://www.Ada-France.org/