From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Wes Groleau <groleau+news@freeshell.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada)
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:57:44 -0500
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
Message-ID: <399kbnF5vle0tU1@individual.net>
References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
 <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org>
 <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk>
 <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02>
 <d0dkq6$781$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <1110284070.410136.205090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <112rs0bdr2aftdf@corp.supernews.com>
 <1inxxr988rxgg$.1w9dedak41k89.dlg@40tude.net>
 <112s1r0rf0o8nca@corp.supernews.com> <d0l2gq$egt$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <112sonip5v4dca6@corp.supernews.com>
 <E1vXd.352556$w62.20389@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <112t3de6fu04f38@corp.supernews.com> <uy8cxfap6.fsf@obry.org>
 <112u7undo5h2q0a@corp.supernews.com> <u3bv4g4nx.fsf@obry.org>
Reply-To: groleau+news@freeshell.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 5nYzJ25wX2CrwGECkQ6mfAlMGnMhSSiHXfJl5I4P/Zx+Ny9kO3
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <u3bv4g4nx.fsf@obry.org>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8988 comp.realtime:1165
 comp.software-eng:4722
Date: 2005-03-09T19:57:44-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:
> I see identical results here, this is on a Windows box using GCC 3.4.4
> and GNAT 5.03a. Of course this is no surprise since GNAT share the very same
> backend! Yet this means just nothing. A good benchmark is done on real

And notice that Pascal did NOT have to suppress safety checks
in Ada to make it just as fast as the C which doesn't have them.
(Or were they hand-coded in the C?)

-- 
Wes Groleau
Can we afford to be relevant?
http://www.cetesol.org/stevick.html