From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.240.203 with SMTP id wc11mr508602pac.29.1383289045774;
        Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.81.162 with SMTP id b2mr221qey.41.1383289045670; Thu, 31
 Oct 2013 23:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!y3no1277255pbx.0!news-out.google.com!9ni3876qaf.0!nntp.google.com!i2no4389138qav.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=178.136.185.69;
 posting-account=K1cP1QoAAAD_GR6kW2Td0NqGqGBLRE8h
NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.136.185.69
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <398b83e9-3735-4c8d-a7e4-f4331bfc4f2b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Why formal_part is not a declarative region?
From: Maxim Reznik <reznikmm@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:57:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17571
Date: 2013-10-31T23:57:25-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi all,

I read ARM "8.1 Declarative Region" for good sleep.

I wounder why formal_part neither access_to_subprogram_definition isn't included in list of declarative regions?

Consider next example:

type T is
 access function (A : Integer) return
 access function (A : Float) return Boolean;

According to ARM there is declarative region for T. It contains two declaration of A, but this is illegal.

What is wrong?

-- 
Maxim Reznik