From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18385551e0d37b37
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-03 00:07:39 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail
From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada replacements for DOS I/O
Date: 2 Nov 1994 08:40:59 -0600
Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services   +1 713 684 5969
Message-ID: <3988dr$8g3@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
References: <44279.cwarwick@fox.nstn.ns.ca> <38qq4u$as2@theopolis.orl.mmc.com>
 <EMERY.94Nov1144245@goldfinger.mitre.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com
Date: 1994-11-02T08:40:59-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <EMERY.94Nov1144245@goldfinger.mitre.org>,
David Emery <emery@goldfinger.mitre.org> wrote:
>>I know of NO Ada system on any platform that handles tasks and I/O
>>that well.
>
>The reason is that it's not a compiler problem, but rather an
>operating system problem.  Ada cannot be held responsible for
>shortcomings in operating systems.
>

Especially one the isn't an OS, but rather a file system with a bad
attitude. :-)

-- 
Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2)        ||This is not your
   	      Ada -- Very Cool.  Doesn't Suck.               ||  father's Ada 
For all sorts of interesting Ada tidbits, run the command:   ||________________
"finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)
   ObNitPick: Spelling Ada as ADA is like spelling C++ as CPLUSPLUS. :-)